FDA Warning Letter · #717576
Novo Nordisk Inc. — FDA Warning Letter (March 5, 2026)
Primary Source
View the original FDA letter on fda.gov →
https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/novo-nordisk-inc-717576-03052026
Summary
- Company
- Novo Nordisk Inc.
- Letter number
- #717576
- Issue date
- March 5, 2026
- Subject
- Postmarketing Adverse Drug Experience Reporting Requirements
What FDA cited
This Warning Letter informs you of objectionable conditions observed during the U.S.
From the letter
Read full letter on FDA.gov →Quoted verbatim from the FDA warning letter dated March 5, 2026
This Warning Letter informs you of objectionable conditions observed during the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) inspection conducted at your firm, Novo Nordisk Inc. (hereinafter referred to as NNI), between January 13 and February 7, 2025. The investigators representing FDA reviewed your compliance with postmarketing adverse drug experience (PADE) regulations. The inspection revealed serious violations of PADE reporting requirements found in section 505(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) [21 U.S.C. 355(k)] and Title 21, Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR) 314.80. Failure to comply with section 505(k) is a prohibited act under section 301(e) of the FD&C Act [21 U.S.C. 331(e)].
This inspection was conducted as a part of FDA’s Bioresearch Monitoring Program, which includes inspections designed to ensure that accurate, reliable, and timely safety data are submitted to FDA for the monitoring of product safety, and to ensure compliance with PADE regulations.
At the conclusion of the inspection, the investigators presented and discussed with you the Form FDA 483, Inspectional Observations. We acknowledge receipt of your written response to the Form FDA 483 dated March 3, 2025, and your subsequent correspondence dated April 11, 2025; May 2, 2025; June 6, 2025; July 11, 2025; September 19, 2025; October 31, 2025; and January 15, 2026.
From our review of the FDA Establishment Inspection Report, the documents submitted with that report, and your written response and correspondence dated March 3, 2025; April 11, 2025; May 2, 2025; June 6, 2025; July 11, 2025; September 19, 2025; October 31, 2025; and January 15, 2026, it appears that you did not adhere to the applicable statutory requirements in the FD&C Act and applicable regulations contained in 21 CFR part 314.
Failure to develop written procedures for the surveillance, receipt, evaluation, and reporting of postmarketing adverse drug experiences (ADEs) to FDA as required by 21 CFR 314.80(b).
As an application holder of products with active ingredients including semaglutide, liraglutide, nedosiran sodium, and estradiol, NNI is required to develop written procedures for the surveillance, receipt, evaluation, and reporting of postmarketing adverse drug experiences (ADEs) to FDA. You developed written procedures that failed to ensure that you, and your contractor acting on your behalf, complied with all applicable PADE regulations for the surveillance, receipt, evaluation, and reporting of ADEs.
1. You failed to develop written procedures, as required under 21 CFR 314.80(b), that ensured that you, and your contractor acting on your behalf, reported all serious and unexpected ADEs to FDA within 15 calendar days, in accordance with 21 CFR 314.80(c)(1)(i). PADE regulations require the applicant to report each ADE that is both serious and unexpected, whether foreign or domestic, no later than 15 calendar days from the initial receipt of the information by the applicant (21 CFR 314.80(c)(1)(i)). Specifically:
a. Your written procedure Q014048, “Handling of Adverse Events and Other Safety Information” (Ver: 28.0, Effective Date: 03 Oct 2024), allowed ADEs reported to NNI to be rejected or cancelled (and therefore not to be reported to FDA) if the ADE was considered by the reporter to be unrelated to the product. Specifically, Q014048 excludes reports from the definition of “adverse reaction” if “the reporters specifically state that they believe the events to be unrelated or that a causal relationship can be excluded.” This definition is inconsistent with FDA regulations, which define an ADE as “[a]ny adverse event associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related.” FDA’s regulations require applicants to develop written procedures for, among other things, the reporting of ADEs regardless of whether the event is considered causally related to the product. An ADE that is determined to be both serious and unexpected must be reported to FDA no later than 15 days from the date of initial receipt. Based on your written procedure, your staff or contractor cancelled or rejected serious and unexpected ADEs that were required to be reported within 15 calendar days because they documented these events as being unrelated to the product. For example, Argus1 Case #1331385 involves a consumer who was disabled after experiencing a stroke, which is a serious and unexpected ADE, while receiving liraglutide. The consumer reported that the stroke was not related to liraglutide; therefore, you rejected this case. As a result, you failed to report serious and unexpected ADEs to FDA within 15 calendar days, as required by PADE regulations.
Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Quoted as a verbatim excerpt for editorial commentary; no claim is made beyond what FDA itself has published. The full letter is available at https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/novo-nordisk-inc-717576-03052026
What FDA warning letters mean
A warning letter is FDA's principal means of telling a company that the agency considers something it's doing — a marketing claim, a manufacturing practice, a labeling choice — to violate the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Companies typically have 15 working days to respond.
A warning letter is not a recall, a criminal charge, or a finding that the company has broken the law. It is the start of a regulatory conversation. FDA may issue a close-out letter once it is satisfied that the company has corrected the cited issues.
For compounded GLP-1 telehealth providers, the most common citations involve unapproved new drug claims, misbranding, and the use of bulk drug substances not on FDA's approved list under FDCA sections 503A and 503B.
Other warning letters in our database
- Join Josie — February 20, 2026
- FitRx — February 20, 2026
- Kin Meds — February 20, 2026
- Measured — February 20, 2026
- Refills Health — February 20, 2026
Editorial Disclaimer
FDA warning letters are public regulatory communications and do not, on their own, indicate that a company has done anything illegal. Companies often respond to warning letters with corrective action, and many letters are eventually closed out. The full text of this letter is available on fda.gov via the link above.